COMMON EXAMPLES of material deviations in ASTM E2018-24 Property Condition Assessments (PCAs) include:
1.Modified Scope of Work:
•Excluding certain property systems or components from the assessment, such as not evaluating seismic, wind, or flood risks unless specifically requested by the client.
•Including specialized evaluations (e.g., detailed environmental or structural analyses) that exceed the baseline PCA requirements.
2.Cost Threshold Adjustments:
•Waiving or altering the threshold for reporting costs of physical deficiencies (e.g., reporting all deficiencies regardless of cost, instead of adhering to a set minimum like $3,000).
3.Classification of Costs:
•Combining immediate and short-term repair costs into a single category rather than segregating them, which deviates from standard reporting practices.
4.Inclusion of Long-Term Costs:
•Adding long-term cost estimates for repairs or replacements, which is not required under the baseline ASTM E2018-24 guidelines but may be included at the client’s request.
5.Use of Specialized Tools or Techniques:
•Employing advanced tools like thermal imaging for moisture detection, which goes beyond the visual and non-invasive nature of a standard PCA.
6.Exclusion of Routine Maintenance Issues:
•Specifically omitting issues that can be resolved with routine maintenance or minor repairs, as these are considered outside the scope of material physical deficiencies per ASTM guidelines.
These deviations must be clearly documented and justified in the PCA report to ensure transparency and alignment with client expectations.